Blog Post 6- Nonfiction Reading Response

Steven Sinchi
811
ELA

Nonfiction Reading Response

       The death penalty in the United States is becoming a topic that everyone is beginning to wonder its reasons and why we should keep it or not. "To Kill Or Not To Kill," by Patricia Smith explains the entire controversy on examining the death penalty in the United States and whether it is reasonable and why or why not. The author wants the readers to know both sides of the argument and supporting details on why those arguments make sense, such as the death penalty being constitutional or unconstitutional, why government should or should not put people to death, does the death penalty discriminate against minorities, and various other reasons.

       The author of the article isn't emphasizing any point to the extreme, but in the passage, more is being talked about the numbers of the people that have been executed and how death penalty causes "significant problems." It may be that the author is biased towards the banning of death penalties because maps, graphs, cartoons, and a timeline all lean towards people wanting to get rid of death penalties. For example, the timeline shows different times in history where law has been edited and changed so that death penalty would be less and less of what it is, a punishment. "1972. Imposed a nationwide moratorium on the death penalty, which the court said was being applied in an arbitrary and inconsistent manner." "2002. Barred the execution of the mentally disabled." "2008. Restricted the death penalty to crimes in which the victim is killed, or cases of treason." In addition to this, the author puts two great points on why death penalty should be banned, and only one of why it shouldn't, "'The death penalty really is declining and on its way out.'" After this con about death penalty, one quote supports the other side of the argument. "'There are some crimes from which any lesser punishment is not punishment.'" After this quote, a quote by the President is placed to add some more bias, "'We have seen significant problems- racial bias, uneven application of the death penalty... situations in which there were individuals on the death row who later on were discovered to have been innocent because of [new] evidence.'" In addition to this, words that have stronger judgement to it are horrific, terribly, torture, innocent, inadequate, inconsistent with basic American values, cruel, punishment, striking, guttural, mishaps, succumbing, and other words that support the debate against death penalty.

       This article has changed my way of thinking that everyone wanted the death penalty, but as shown in the article, the pro death penalty side is sharply decreasing and more people are supporting the act of abolishing death penalties once and for all. This now makes me think differently about our government and why it makes the decisions it makes (ex. basing something off the constitution). If I were to continue to research, I would make sure to look out for biased articles, because I will most likely get information and arguments from both sides of the controversy.

-Works Cited:

Smith, Patricia. "To Kill Or Not To Kill." Upfront 17 Nov. 2014: 8-11. Print.